Dartford Science and Technology College

Dartford TC > History > A Level History >
A Level History Discussion Forum - How liberal were the liberal Tory reforms 1822-29?

Tools

Linear View Threaded View Spacer Topic Stats

How liberal were the liberal Tory reforms 1822-29?

Mr Walker(DART_walkera)  21 Sep 2011 17:01
Key ingredients
1. Answer the q in the first line!
2 Show a K and U of the actual reforms - Huskisson - Robinson - Peel - Combination Acts - Corn Law sliding scale, Test and Corporations act - tax, catholic emancipation etc.
3 Assess how liberal they were - refer to your 'answer' after each paragraph
4. Write a conclusion which sums up your argument

How liberal were the Liberal Tory reforms 1822-29?

The Liberal Tories were liberal under Robert Peel as they introduced reforms that benefitted the working class. Liberals believed in individualism and the right to be free to do as you wish until the freedom begins to affect others. These acts of freedom were known as ‘Inalienable rights’ which meant they could not be taken away from the people. In addition, John Stuart Mills, a liberal, believed that everyone should be given equal rights, campaigning for the working class including women to be given the right to vote.

During the period, 1822-29 the Liberal Tories introduced a number of reforms. The party and in particular William Huskisson, believed in free trade between countries, which in turn would benefit the poverty stricken working class. This involved relaxing the Navigation Acts in 1822, which had previously prevented foreign ships transporting between Britain and the British Empire. These benefitted the working class and were therefore a liberal reform. In the years 1824 and 1825, William Huskisson reduced significantly the price of duties on necessary everyday items for the working class, for example on silk, cotton and linen. In total, the duties fell to 20%, which extensively benefitted the working class, who since the introduction of the Corn Laws in 1815, had suffered hugely and ended in deeper poverty.

In addition, Peel introduced the Reform of the Penal Code, which meant the death penalty was removed for the majority of crimes, which had previously been a hanging offence. This reform resulted in a more humane system of punishment and appropriate punishment was handed out instead. This was a liberal reform, as until that time, people were being harshly punished for ridiculous crimes. Furthermore the introduction of the Metropolitan Police in 1829, bought safer streets and a feeling of proper control, instead of volunteer yeomanry and magistrates.

After the death of Lord Liverpool in 1828, the Tory party split with some entering The Ultras, who wanted no further reforms, while others remained as Liberal Tories. Although the party were faced with turmoil, in 1828, the party managed to pass a modification of the Corn Laws. This helped the working class by slightly reducing the price of duties on imported corn. Although this was possibly the least liberal of all the reforms, it was heading in the right direction. Moreover, in 1828, Protestants that were not Church of England were allowed to take up their seats in Parliament. In addition in 1829, after a fierce battle by Daniel O’Connell, an Catholic MP who had won a seat for his constituency in County Clare, Ireland, was finally granted the right to take up his seat, despite his faith. This was known as the Catholic Emancipation. This was a liberal reform because it allowed a mix of faiths to join together in Parliament and work together for the first time.

In conclusion, the Liberal Tories introduced a number of reforms that benefitted the poverty stricken working class that previously struggled considerably, due to reforms introduced by Lord Liverpool between the years 1815 and 1822. The most important reform introduced was the reducing of duties on imported goods in 1824 and 1825. This reform was predominantly beneficial because it allowed the working class to afford everyday items that they previously could not, due to the high amount of taxes and duties placed on them. The least beneficial reform was that of the Modification of the Corn Laws in 1828, because although it had the potential to be extremely advantageous to the working class, it failed to reduce the duty on imported goods significantly to allow the working class to afford the corn.
 
www -This is a clear grade A response Emma - accurate K and U and chronology. Good consistent sustained argument nicely summarised in the conclusion
ebi - you had a clearer K and U of liberalism to measure the reform against - go back and look at the liberalism PPT again and pick out say 3 main features

Emma Cooper(Dart_05CooEmm) 
The liberal tories were quite liberal, they made the cost of living easier for the working class and helped them out of severe poverty after the government before made some terrible decisions and were protecting ther high/ landed classes.The liberal tories emerged in the late 18th century as a product of the industrial revolution.  The liberal tories made some very crucial and liberal movements however where they totally liberal?
 
The liberal tories had a lassez faire attitude during this period and this free'd up many laws and acts which meant that the flow of the government, trading etc went down, which therefore made the cost of living go down. This is where the idea of free trade came in by smith, who strongly believed that the government should 'leave alone' the economy and let it flow. Husskinson passed the navagation acts in 1822, and this meant that these were passed in order to protect the British shipping from competition with the Dutch in the 17th century. They prevented foreign ships from transporting goods to or from chemas-microsoft-comSurprisedfficeConfusedmarttags" />t="on">ountry-region wConfusedt="on">Britainountry-region> and British colonies so that only British ships could do this. These laws were no longer necessary as ountry-region wConfusedt="on">t="on">Britainountry-region> was now a much stronger trading nation. The navigation acts also restricted trade even more because other countries simply retaliated with their own laws banned British ships from their ports. chemas-microsoft-comSurprisedfficeSurprisedffice" /> This is what lassez faire means, to have a laid back approach. This was quite a liberal act as it made life and the cost of living much cheaper for the woking class and relieved the distress from the previous period from 1815-22.
 
Secondly the liberal tories were liberal as they believed that the crime system in the country was not humane, and that there were too many crimes that were given the consequences of the death penalty and this was not humane. Following this idea Robert Peel, the home secretary, introduced the metropolitain police in 1829. This was a very liberal act as it would control crime and be a more humane way of dealing with crimes and giving punishments.
 
Furthermore the Liberal tories, set up the Gaols act in 1823, the conditions of the gaols were disgraceful, the prisoners where alowed to do what they like, the cleanliness was terrible and there were no inspections, also the punishments were extremely harsh. again, this was an act of being humane and the act meant that the goals were inspected and the conditions were considerable better. This was a quite liberal act as this benefited the prisoners however, its not the best liberal act they have done.
 
Moreover, could the liberal tories have been more liberal? Yes, they could. The liberal tories could have made many more acts or changed laws to benefit the people. Also, in the opinion of some, the liberal tories could have also have set up the acts to benefit themselves, for example, why did the govenment stop there? They may have given more freedom and relieved the distress from the worjking class freedom, ,however they only gave as much as they wanted to give. For example in 1828 the government, dropped the corn laws and introduced the sliding scale, however raised it so much, how they were comfortable with it.
 
In conclusion, The liberal Tories were not so liberal after all, they only gave the working class people what they wanted just a tad to calm them down and avoid protest. For example the Gaols act, was only passed because the humanitarians were protesting and bothering the government. The government had a lassez faire approach and could not be bothered with the protests etc, that they believed they may be faced with from the pervious period of 1815-22, therefore gave them some freedom. Finally, people could argue that the introduction of the metropolitan police was liberal, moreover the general belief is that the Liberal Tories could have defiantly been more Liberal.
 
 A/B
www. good to see an answer straight away in the first line. Very good opening paragraph. K and U accurate and at right level of depth. Argument is sustained and backed up with evidence
 
ebi - spell check! Also you could have shown a little more balance - for instance are there any alternative interpretations of what the liberal Tories did - maybe they were acting out of sensible self interest rather than liberal principles - they were Tories after all!

Marnie Blackmore(Dart_06BlaMar) 

One of the liberals key beliefs was individualism, which Is where people should be free to develop their talents and happiness, and also have several ‘inalienable rights’ which they believe the state should protect such as freedom to worship and equality before the law. Liberals believed that these rights could not be taken away from individuals. The years 1822-29 saw the Liberal Tories introducing a number of reforms, such as free trade, penal code reform and changing of the Combination Acts.  chemas-microsoft-comSurprisedfficeSurprisedffice" />

 

1822 saw Huskisson, the President of Board of Trade, believe in free trade. This is where goods are traded between countries without any duties or taxes being charged, thus leading to more trade and greater prosperity. An example of a free trade reform introduced by the Liberal Tories was the relaxation of the Navigation Acts 1822, which had previously prevented foreign ships transported between chemas-microsoft-comSurprisedfficeConfusedmarttags" />ountry-region wConfusedt="on">Britainountry-region> and the t="on">British Empire. This, along with other free trade reforms, benefitted those people, namely the working class, thus making it a liberal reform. Another liberal reform from this period was the reduction of duties from 1824-25, where the duties on goods such as rum, silk, wool, cotton and linen were reduced. Over this period, duties on all other goods fell from 50% to 20%, which although it was not a completely liberal act as there were still duties on goods, the reform benefitted the working class as they were able to afford to buy these goods.

 

Alongside this, Robert Peel, the Home Secretary introduced the Reform of the Penal Code from 1824-26, which saw the abolition of the death penalty for the majority of crimes and hundreds of capital offenses removed. This particular reform was liberal in the way that it resulted in a more humane system of punishment as people were not being inappropriately punished. In 1823, Peel also introduced the Gaols Act, where prisons became more humane in the way that they were no longer filthy and unregulated. Overall, Peel was responsible for making the English law both more efficient and humane, thus his reforms were liberal.

 

Since 1799, Trade Unions had been illegal but the Liberal Tory government, since they were trying to improve the economy, felt that these Combinations Acts were actually causing harm to the economy.

 

This was a very liberal reform, and an important step for the working class as they were able to campaign and
 
 C+
www - good definition of liberalism you can use as a yardstick. Sound basic K &U of some (but not all) key reforms
ebi - a little more balance perhaps needed - for instance you say Huskisson strongly believed in free trade - not sure this is sutainable given that his reforms did not introduce complete free trade

Ashleigh Haines(Dart_04HaiAsh) 

The liberal Tories were liberal between 1822 – 1829 and made many reforms to benefit the working class. Liberals believed managed by Robert Peel, in individualism. This was the centre of liberals thinking, they believed people should be free to expand their talents and excel in their own happiness. Individuals are said to have several ‘Inalienable rights’ which they have a right to be protected, e.g. have freedom of worship, conscience, speech, right to hold property and equality before the law etc. John Stuart Mill said you should have the right to complete freedom until it starts harming others.

 

During the period of, 1822-29 the Liberal Tories introduced many reforms. A man in particular William Huskisson, believed in free trade between countries, which in turn would benefit the poverty suffering working class. This also involved the ‘Navigation Acts’ in 1822, this prevented foreign ships from transporting between ountry-region wConfusedt="on">Britainountry-region> and the t="on">British Empire, this benefitted the working class and was a liberal reform. The Tories also introduced the ‘Gaols Act’ in 1823 this helped improve the conditions for people in prison; the Gaols were frequently inspected to check the conditions were up to standard.

 

In addictions Peel introduced the ‘Penal Code’ this meant that the death penalty was removed for a majority of crimes, which were before a hanging offence. This resulted in a more humane approach to the system of punishment. This was a very liberal reform as before people were punished so harshly for ridiculous crimes. Moreover the introduction of the Metropolitan Police in 1829 made the streets safer and brought a better feeling of control, rather than volunteering of the yeomanry and magistrates.


C

www. good K and U of some of the key reforms with some sound K& U of what constitutes liberalism. You have also made a good attempt at answering the question ' yes they were liberal because...'

ebi you could easily push this up a couple of grades by developing the  argument. For instance you say that liberals believe in free trade and that Huskisson introduced free trade reforms so was therefore a liberal... fair enough.. however  if you think about this a bit more closely H's reforms only reduced tariffs rather than getting rid of them so were only a step away from protectionism towards liberalism - the Lib Tories therefore only partially liberal or maybe motivated by something other than liberalism. It is when you get into really discussing these sorts of points that you start hitting the really high grades


Chloe Hughes(Dart_06HugChl) 
The Liberal Tories were quite liberal for the time period in which they lived. When disussing the Liberal Tories and the reforms that they made, it has to be considered how Britain was only just emerging from the great repression that lasted between 1815-1822. With Lord Liverpool still Prime minister in 1822, and with the decline of the radical movement and protests, the government were able to make some reforms that would benefit the people throughout Britain. With the repression being eased and the introduction of a new govrnment still led by lor liverpool, reforms were made and the people within Birtiain began to see changes within the system as they economy improved. The Liberal tories belived in freedom of right and almost formed tghe foundations of human rights. They believed that everyone should be offered the same oppurtunities and then should have the choice to use these oppurtunities to the best of their ability. Yet , these ideas were dellusional in some ways, the liberals were sure that if everyone was offered the oppurtunities they needed they would use them to their advantage, yet it is human nature that not everyone will confrom to this idea.
The new cabinet consisted of new , youger men, who replaced the hated previous opressors such as Lord Sidmouth and Lord Castlereagh. This new cabinet was a catalyst for the new beginnings and improvements that britain was to experinece.
 
The reforms that the Liberal Tories made, may seem meager in present day, but for the time in which they were stated and passed, this meant that the huge dark cloud of misery over the population in Britain began to ease up. The first ofbthe reforms that led the way for the rest of them was the belief of Free Trade. William Huskisson, the president of the board of trade, belived that there should be free trade and that trade between countries should not be taxed. He belived that this idea would lead to greater prosperity and would increase the economy within Britain. With the relaxation of the navigation acts in 1822 this allowede Britain to trade with the Britrish empire along with the Reciprocity of Duties Act that stated , if anither country was to tax Britain when selling its goods, Britain would do likewise. Also, the duties on certain products were reduced falling from 50% to 20%. These first refroms were major for the time in which hey were passed, they offered a glint of hope to those that had suffered througout the previous years. The Liberal Tories were already proving themselves to be much more liberal than the previous cabinet, yet for present day views, they would not seem to be radically liberal.
 
In 1824-26 there was a reform of the penal code. For decades people had been terrified by the fear of the death penalty as it held power over so many samll offences and was a consequence that offered no alternative. With the reformation of the Penal code accompanied by the Gaols act of 1823 meant that suibtable punishments were offered for suitable offences. This showed some order in the realm of crime and punishment. Also, the gaols act of 1823, meant that the conditions of jails were improved, prisoners were now educated and womena and men had separate prisons. This was very liberal for the Tories to do, this reformed the entire perspective on punishment within Britain, and some of these changes are stuill present in todays Britain. Robert Peel's, the home secretary, introduction of the Metropolitan police in 1829 was one of the largest reforms that topok place in Britain, yet the some question whether this was promopeted by liberalism or merely logic. The metropoilitan police acted as a deterrant for crime and demonstrated some order within Britain. The Liberal Tories, were indeed Liberal in comparison to their previous cabinet, people were so used to being opressed that with the introduction of the new governement, people were freed from some of their misery. IOn 1828 came the modification of The Corn Laws, this slightly reduced the tax on imported corn and allowed the poor access to higher amounts of corn. This is an example of how the gpovernment were not completely liberal, they had the power to change the corn laws and relieve all of the pressure on the poor, but insterad they only modified them slightly, although the people were grateful, it could be explored why the Tories did not reform this law more.
 
After the resignation and death of Lord Liverpool in 1827-28, George canning was appointed prime minister yet soon died, Goderich took over but resigned in 1828, Then the Duke of Wellington took over, yet his ideas were aither black or white due to his militant nature. The party split into two and the liberal tories were led by huskisson.
 
The Liberal tories were liberal in comparison to the previous government and yet their reforms were not swayed by liberalism but more by logic. All of the reforms that they made were merely adapted from the idea of restoring the coiuntry and improving the economy. They were not liberal acts, they were more acts that were in dia need of being passed, they were acts that created the foundation of a successful economy, and in some opnions they could be seen as being throuroughly outdated, some could challenge why these reforms were not passed earlier, and why Britain had to suffer between 1815-22 and others belive that the liberalism began before the liberal tories came tro power. It has to be considered that with the execution of the protesters and the transoportation of these radicals, there were no more protestors to cause disruption. It could be a mere coincidence that the liberal came into power around the same time that the idea of protest and disturbance had died out and the government were no longer terrified of the example of the frech revolution. For the time period in which they were around, the Liberal Tories were indeed liberal compared to the previous repressive cabinet.
 
www very good start. Excellent K and U and chronology. In depth knowledge of liberal ideas. A mature and sustained argument. What I particularly like about this is the way in which your argument devlops as the essay progresses. This is a clear A* answer
 
ebi spell check!

Amber Beach(Dart_06BeaAmb) 

Its me again

How liberal were the liberal Tory reforms 1822-29?

 

The liberal Tories where pretty liberal in the time they where in power as they introduced  reforms they brought in benefitted the working class and went against the laws which where brought in from 1815–22 with the old parliament. The Liberal Tories where led by Lord Liverpool until his death in 1827 when they where led by George Canning.

 

The liberal Tories brought in a number of reforms but the most influential and Liberal reform in my opinion is free trade, this meant that imported goods wouldn’t have duties on and so relieved many people as it meant cheaper produce could come in. Huskisson was president of the board of trade and believed in free trade and it was on his behalf that these reforms where brought in to make free trade. With free trade having fewer duties on as well it meant that everyone benefitted from it as the poor could afford items etc and so riots and protesting. Free trade was actually a mix of four acts introduced from 1822- 25 which in order meant that ships could trade between Britain, its Empire and other countries; that if a country lowered duties Britain would do likewise;  duties on rum etc where lowered and finally duties fell from 50% to 20%. This was very liberal as it meant that goods came in cheaper and so the price of those goods would fall in ountry-region wConfusedt="on">t="on">Britainountry-region> which meant the cost of living fell and really helped the working class.

 

Another Liberal reform was the reform of the Penal Code, this was introduced from 1824- 26 and meant that the death penalties for most crimes (over 200 with capital punishment) had over 100 taken away which brought a more humane system in. Most death penalties where replaced by more humane punishments such as imprisonment.  The government also brought in the Gaols act of 1823 which meant that Gaolers where to be paid by the government and the whole prison system was to be revamped so they where not filthy and inhumane anymore. Prisons where also to be inspected and education given to prisoners, this made the system much more civilized. This was liberal as it meant that more humane punishments and a prison system was brought in which really relieved the stress of people going to prison as they didn’t fear dying there now.

 

After the death of Lord Liverpool, George Canning took over but died, then Goderich took over but resigned until in 1828 the Duke of Wellington took over and split the cabinet in half with the Liberal Tories and the Ultra Tories. With the cabinet split in half liberal reforms where still brought in with in 1828 the Corn Laws being reduced. This really helped the economy as it meant that the poor could afford to eat. refer to title - was this liberal?

 

In 1828 and 1829 two laws where brought in which allowed Catholics and non C of E Protestants to become MPs. The two laws where Repeal of Test and Corporations act (1828) and the Catholic Relief act (1829). This was a liberal reform as it meant that a wider range of people could become MPs and also meant that a mix of different faiths could work together in parliament. refer to title - was this liberal?

 

Robert Peel introduced the first police force in t="on">ountry-region wConfusedt="on">Britainountry-region> in 1829. Before this the law was enforced by the local yeomanry which tended to attack people if they where in the wrong as really they didn’t know better. The police system was a great addition to Britain as it meant people where being caught for their crimes and punished accordingly, this was liberal as it meant that crime dropped and so Britain was actually safer. refer to title - was this liberal?


C/D www. excellent K & U of many of the key reforms related to and measured against a sound understanding of liberal principles

ebi - you start to build up evidence to back up your opinion - a good way of doing this is by referring to the title as you finish each paragraph then summarise in your conclusion what you have attempted to prove. You could also improve this by thinking of some alternative reasons why the 'liberal' tories passed the reforms that they did e.g. Peel may have been motivated by a practical desire to make the law more coherent rather than by liberal principles. Wellington when he introduced Catholic emancipation may have been motivated by ther desire to end the unrest in Ireland rather than by liberalism

Conclusion to be uploaded in due time




George Money(DART_06mongeo) 

In my opinion I think that, the Liberal Tories between 1822-1829 were very Liberal due to all the reforms that they made. Liberalism is the core of the liberals’ way of thinking. They wanted to help the rest of the population by introducing free trade between countries, the freedom to be an individual and have your own beliefs and the right to free speech.

Robert Peel, who was the home sectary for the Liberal Tories during this period, introduced many reforms which massively helped the working class. This included the jails (gaols) act in 1823. This provided a safer and more humane for place for people living in jails and it also made sure that they were frequently inspected and that the inmates were given an education.

Other reforms that made the Tories more liberal were the changes in the prices on all duties. Originally the prices of everyday products were put up considerably making it hard for the working class to provide things for their families. However, they reformed this problem, by reducing the prices. Once this happened some products were just 20% of the original cost which majorly helped the people.

Another liberal act made by William Huskisson, who was the president of the board of trade, believed in free trade between countries as he thought it would increase ountry-region wConfusedt="on">t="on">Britainountry-region>’s prosperity and it economy.

The Liberal Tories were very liberal as they changed many things about the country that really helped every one, and after the last cabinet that had been in power, the reforms that happened were needed to help the country survive.


Natasha Champion(Dart_06ChaNat) 

Top Exam Answer Tips

Here are the top tips we agreed from looking at each other answers and feedback and looking at an examiners mark scheme
 

Top Exam Tips for History

chemas-microsoft-comSurprisedfficeSurprisedffice" /> 

  1. refer to the title as you go through
  2. Answer the question in first line
  3. Have K & U – come to the exam prepared – read widely
  4. Write a conclusion that summarised what you have argued
  5. Be chronologically aware – know your dates – be date aware
  6. write clearly and check your spelling and grammar
  7. Show judgement and BALANCE
Now try and first two questions on this interactive exam paper exercise http://www.educationforum.co.uk/history/exampractice/exampractice.html
 

Mr Walker(DART_walkera) 
The liberal Tories were very liberal in the years 1822 - 1829 .Liberals believed in individualsim and the right to do whatever they wanted to do until there freedom begins to effect others .A Key believer in individualsim was a man known as John stuart mills and believed in the idea of being free .
 
During the years of 1822 - 1829 the liberal tories introuced many reforms .The first reform was free trade and that the trade between countries should not be taxed .A man named willian Huskissson ,the president of bored of trade  believed that is should be free .In 1822 an act was set up which allowed countries to trade without being taxed .Also prices on essential items reduced from a staggering 50 % .This then allowed people to have hope and gave them  a bit of desire that things would get better .
 
Moreover in the years 1824 - 26 was the reform of the penal code .This set an order to crime and took away the death penatly to crime and took away the death penatly and gave more order to th prisons and allowed reform .This improved prisoners lifestyles and made them better educated for the future .
 
Lastly in the years 1828 was the corn laws which slightly cut down prices of corn and allowed the poorer people to have access to corn .This helped people a lot considring the circumstances that they had been through before .
 
In conclusion in 1822 - 1829 the liberal tories were liberal in contrast to the previous governments .During the time that they were around the liberal tories were indeed liberal . 
 
B/C www. Good K and U on liberalism and on some of the liberal Tory reforms - your last sentence also suggests what could have been a very powerful argument
 
ebi Try and think a little deeper about the question - for instance Huskisson's reforms were only a step towards freer trade not full free trade itself - how 'liberal' were Peel's reforms or were they just motivated by common sense?
 

Danielle Lynch(DART_06lyndan) 

How Liberal were the Liberal Tories?

The Liberal Tories were quite liberal when they were in power (1822 – 1829). They brought in new laws which benefitted the people and were a pleasant change from those introduced by Lord Liverpool’s Torie government (1815 – 1822) Lord Liverpool was the leader of The Liberal Tories until his death in 1827, leaving George Canning to take over. Under adapted governing, Britain began to see significant change. Radical protests started to decrease as the people were beginning to be happier with the way their country was being run.

Robert Peel was an influential member of the Torie party. Peel was responsible for a number of reforms such as that of the penal code (1824) which saw the incredibly high number of crimes punishable by death drop rapidly. He believed in efficiency and order: Peel is also credited with the induction of the Metropolitan Police in 1829 – an idea which has developed throughout history and is still used today. Before Peel’s Police, the law was upheld by a group known collectively as the yeomanry. The yeomanry were local men with swords who were aiming to protect what was theirs. They were present during the infamous Peterloo Massacre of 1819 in which 11 people died at their hand, and over 400 people were injured. The introduction of the Police Force meant the often vicious yeomanry were no longer needed and that crime was to be dealt with more accordingly – this, combined with the reform of the penal code was a liberal move as it meant people were no longer being mercilessly executed; it meant they had some chance to fight for their rights and were also being punished in a more suitable fashion.

Free Trade being brought in was another liberal action. This meant that there were no longer high duties on imported food which was a relief to the poorer members of the society.

D

Www. A good start. You cover peels reforms well and make a good effort as evaluating them

Ebi you need to finish this... I can't really award an accurate  grade until you do
 

The Liberal Tories were quite liberal when they were in power (1822 – 1829). They brought in new laws which benefitted the people and were a pleasant change from those introduced by Lord Liverpool’s Tory government (1815 – 1822) Lord Liverpool was the leader of The Liberal Tories until his death in 1827, leaving George Canning to take over. Under adapted governing, Britain began to see significant change. Radical protests started to decrease as the people were beginning to be happier with the way their country was being run.

Robert Peel was an influential member of the Tory party. Peel was responsible for a number of reforms such as that of the penal code (1824) which saw the incredibly high number of crimes punishable by death drop rapidly. He believed in efficiency and order: Peel is also credited with the induction of the Metropolitan Police in 1829 – an idea which has developed throughout history and is still used today. Before Peel’s Police, the law was upheld by a group known collectively as the yeomanry. The yeomanry were local men with swords who were aiming to protect what was theirs. They were present during the infamous Peterloo Massacre of 1819 in which 11 people died at their hand, and over 400 people were injured. The introduction of the Police Force meant the often vicious yeomanry were no longer needed and that crime was to be dealt with more accordingly – this, combined with the reform of the penal code was a liberal move as it meant people were no longer being mercilessly executed; it meant they had some chance to fight for their rights and were also being punished in a more suitable fashion.

The Tory party were very interested in free trade – especially William Huskisson (the president of the board of trade) – Free Trade being brought in was another liberal action. This meant that there were no longer high duties on imported food which was a relief to the poorer members of the society. The belief that goods should be traded between countries with no tax or duties – leading to a much more prosperous future was reformed by Huskisson and was a liberal act.

The Liberal Tories can also be credited for the Gaols acts of 1823 which saw the condition of prisons increase drastically. Formerly, they were a disgrace with the inmates being allowed to do as they wished whilst they were kept in filthy conditions. There was no real order and the gaols were awful. The Gaols act led to the improvement of this and was a liberal choice as it was of benefit to those kept there.  

Furthermore, the Tories were also responsible for the induction of catholic emancipation in 1829. This meant that the Roman Catholics were granted the same rights as everyone else. They were now able to run for a place in the government, or become a judge etc. Lord Liverpool was opposed to giving them equal rights formerly as he was a strict member of the Church of England. However, when O’Connell was voted into government but was unable to take his place to him being Roman Catholic, Wellington decided to pass catholic emancipation as he feared a revolt from the Irish. Therefore, Roman Catholics being giving equal rights can be seen as both a liberal and non-liberal move.

In conclusion, the Tories were quite liberal, but, not completely. They can be credited with several successful reforms but there are also instances of them being non-liberal and doing things due to fear and need for efficiency – not to be liberal and for the sake of the people.
WWW: You have explained Robert Peel very well and you have shown a clear understanding of the other Liberal Tories, and have shown good explanation in your answers.
EBI: Maybe add a little more about how Liberal they were, explain it in more detail.
Grade: B
 

Siobhan Cooper(Dart_07CooSio) 

How liberal were the liberal tories?

The liberal tories were (1822-29) very liberal because one of the main views of liberalism is human rights and the liberal tories reinstated habeas corpus which means a person cannot be in prison for more than 24 hours unless there’s evidence. Another point on the liberal tories support of human rights is the repeal of the penal code and making sentences more lenient. The liberal tories also made it able for Catholics to have seats in parliament.

 

William Huskission also allowed free trade into Britain and the tories also made the reciprocation acts which meant if another country wouldn’t tax British goods Britain wouldn’t tax that country in return this led to an economic prosperity. The liberal tories trade with newly independent countries such as South America which just became independent from Spanish rule.

 

Robert peel also introduced the gaol (jails) act which led to prisons being cleaner and more humane this also led to the formation of separate prisons for men and women.

 

In conclusion the liberal tories were very liberal this is supported by their support of human rights, free trade and their freedom of religion and the acts they released for these points


D

Www the evaluation is good.. You make some strong and persuasive points about liberalism and the liberal Tories

Ebi you don't reveal enough detailed k and u and the reforms themselves to secure the higher grades


Jackson(DART_07charliejackson) 

Re : How liberal were the liberal tories?

new post
 

How liberal were the liberal tories?chemas-microsoft-comSurprisedfficeSurprisedffice" />

The liberal tories were (1822-29) very liberal because one of the main views of liberalism is human rights and the liberal tories reinstated habeas corpus which means a person cannot be in prison for more than 24 hours unless there’s evidence. Another point on the liberal tories support of human rights is the repeal of the penal code and making sentences more lenient. The liberal tories passed the catholic emancipation act (1829) also made it able for Catholics to have seats in parliament. Another religious equality act was the test and corporation’s act which meant people in government could not use their power to weaken the protestant church

William Huskission also allowed free trade into Britain and the tories also made the reciprocation acts which meant if another country wouldn’t tax British goods Britain wouldn’t tax that country in return this led to an economic prosperity. The liberal tories trade with newly independent countries such as South America which just became independent from Spanish rule.

Robert peel also introduced the gaol (jails) act which led to prisons being cleaner and more humane this also led to the formation of separate prisons for men and women.

You could argue not all the liberal Tories were very liberal because the party was divided and joined different conservative groups such as the ultra-Tories and the Whigs the party was divided after acts of religious equality were passed such as the test and corporations act and the catholic emancipation act the conservative party was completely divided

In conclusion the liberal Tories were very liberal this is supported by their support of human rights, free trade and their freedom of religion and the acts they released for these points
 

C+.  Good evaluation and conclusion.

EBI – you talk about other people such as George Canning.

 

Jackson(DART_07charliejackson) 

How liberal were the liberal Tory reforms 1822-29.

How liberal were the liberal Tory reforms 1822-29.

The liberal tories were liberal in the years 1822-29, they made lots of reforms that were beneficial to the working class people, and gave them better standard of living and working conditions. The liberals believed in the right of individualism and didn’t want the freedom to affect people in Britain.

The first liberal reform was the trade between countries and this means no taxes on foods had to be paid. This idea came from William Husskisson, who was the president of board of trade. William Husskisson believed in free trade, he said that free traders should be traded between countries without any taxes being charged. This helped the working class people because it didn’t make them pay for higher taxes and also led greater prosperity to everyone during that period. In 1823, Husskisson encouraged parliament to pass the reprocity of goods acts, so this meant if a foreign country reduced the duty or tax for British goods entering their country, then Britain would do the same, (in other words they would reciprocate). So this act was very liberal and very beneficial to the working class people because they wouldn’t have to pay for tax on their everyday items. 

In addition, Robert peel introduced the penal code. The penal code in England was made up of hundreds of different laws which stated what sentences should be administered for which offence you have occurred. Some of the laws that were set up weren’t even effective and completely irrelevant; and there were very harsh. For instance, Death penalty abolished for the majority of crimes (previously you could be executed for a range of bizarre crimes, such as impersonating a Chelsea Pensioner, pick pocketing or damaging Westminster Bridge. Thisi was a liberal reform because peel set out to change this, he wanted to make the laws more relevant and effective, and got rid of all the old laws and shortened the whole penal code. He also introduced the metropolitan police, which was more safe and the first proper police for in UK.

C+

Www very good technique . You address the question straight away and argue quite persuasively

Ebi it's unfinished which pushes its grade a little .. If you complete I will remark 
 

How liberal were the liberal Tory reforms 1822-29.

The liberal tories were liberal in the years 1822-29, they made lots of reforms that were beneficial to the working class people, and gave them better standard of living and working conditions. The liberals believed in the right of individualism and didn’t want the freedom to affect people in Britain.

The first liberal reform was the trade between countries and this means no taxes on foods had to be paid. This idea came from William Husskisson, who was the president of board of trade. William Husskisson believed in free trade, he said that free traders should be traded between countries without any taxes being charged. This helped the working class people because it didn’t make them pay for higher taxes and also led greater prosperity to everyone during that period. In 1823, Husskisson encouraged parliament to pass the reprocity of goods acts, so this meant if a foreign country reduced the duty or tax for British goods entering their country, then Britain would do the same, (in other words they would reciprocate). So this act was very liberal and very beneficial to the working class people because they wouldn’t have to pay for tax on their everyday items.

In addition, Robert peel introduced the penal code. The penal code in England was made up of hundreds of different laws which stated what sentences should be administered for which offence you have occurred. Some of the laws that were set up weren’t even effective and completely irrelevant; and there were very harsh. For instance, Death penalty abolished for the majority of crimes (previously you could be executed for a range of bizarre crimes, such as impersonating a Chelsea Pensioner, pick pocketing or damaging Westminster Bridge. This was a liberal reform because peel set out to change this, he wanted to make the laws more relevant and effective and got rid of all the old laws and shortened the whole penal code. He also introduced the metropolitan police, which was more safe and the first proper police for in UK.

Furthermore, another area in which peel carried out reform was the Gaols Act in 1823. The local prisons were often very filthy and inhumane. The gaolers were often unpaid and therefore likely to try and extort money from the inmates. The punishments in the prisons were very harsh and there were also no inspections. However Sidmouth's successor, Robert Peel, was much more sympathetic, and eventually persuaded Parliament to pass the 1823 Gaols Act. I believe this was a liberal reform because they then provided a safer and humane place for the people in jails; they also introduced regular visits by prison chaplains, the prisoners were now educated and they also paid the gaolers.

After the death of Lord Liverpool in 1828, George Canning was the new prime minister but soon died. So after that Goderich took over but resigned in 1828, so then the Duke of wellington took over. However the ministry was not successful as the part spilt into: progressive or liberal tories which were led by Huskisson and the Ultra tories who wanted no reform at all.
B
www- Good explanations of the reforms, lots of detail, refers to the question in every paragraph
ebi - you could write about the trade unions and the catholic emancipation

Amanpreet Dhanda(Dart_06DhaAma) 

How liberal were the liberal tories?

The liberal Tories were quite liberal for the time in which they were in government. They brought in different reforms which were put in place for a mutual reason which was to improve the working conditions and to help the people by contradicting the laws which were put in place by the old government (1815-1822).  The leader of the Liberal Tories was Lord Liverpool, however, after his death in 1827 they were then lead by George Canning.

 

The liberal Tories were quite liberal due to them introducing catholic emancipation. Catholic emancipation was where the liberal Tories abolished the restrictions of the Roman Catholics which had been introduced by the Act of Uniformity, the Test Acts and the penal code. Due to the abolishment of restrictions it meant a little peace for the Roman Catholics as they weren’t so restricted and it gave them a little unity with the other people.

 

Trade union also had an input to the liberal Tories being quite liberal as it meant that the working class were allowed to have meetings and they had people representing them and standing up for the right in which they felt the working class should have. Meetings being allowed were an improvement due to them being banned by the old government, as the old government felt at threat when meetings took place as they were worried it would break out in protest. Therefore allowing meeting to take place benefited the people and helped bring peace due to them being able to discuss the problem which they felt were causing issues and have their say about their working conditions.

 

The forming of the police (1829) shows how the liberal Tories are quite liberal. The police force made order for the people and it meant that people were controlled in a better manor. Before the setting up of the police, the people were controlled by the yeomanry, who had a tendency to fight with the people who didn’t bring any order to the situations. However, the forming of the police meant that situations were dealt with in a more orderly fashion, and it was less likely for the police to attack the people like the yeomanry did in the peterloo massacre.

 

The introduction of free trade was another liberal action which made the liberal Tories more liberal as it meant that supplies could be traded from other countries without having high import charges. This meant that the people paid less for food which was a plus side on their behalf as it meant food was more affordable.
 

C

Www you make some good points and sustain the idea that they were liberal quite well

Ebi a little more balance ... How else could they be interpreted? Should they really get credit fo trade union reform and catholic emancipation?
 
How liberal were the Liberal Tories?

The liberal Tories were quite liberal for the time in which they were in government. They brought in different reforms which were put in place for a mutual reason which was to improve the working conditions and to help the people by contradicting the laws which were put in place by the old government (1815-1822). The leader of the Liberal Tories was Lord Liverpool, however, after his death in 1827 they were then lead by George Canning.

The liberal Tories were quite liberal due to them introducing catholic emancipation. Catholic emancipation was where the liberal Tories abolished the restrictions of the Roman Catholics which had been introduced by the Act of Uniformity, the Test Acts and the penal code. Due to the abolishment of restrictions it meant a little peace for the Roman Catholics as they weren’t so restricted and it gave them a little unity with the other people. Catholic emancipation act was passed in 1829; it was put through parliament by Wellington’s ministry.

Trade union also had an input to the liberal Tories being quite liberal as it meant that the working class were allowed to have meetings and they had people representing them and standing up for the right in which they felt the working class should have. Meetings being allowed were an improvement due to them being banned by the old government, as the old government felt at threat when meetings took place as they were worried it would break out in protest. Therefore allowing meeting to take place benefited the people and helped bring peace due to them being able to discuss the problem which they felt were causing issues and have their say about their working conditions. However, Francis Place was actually responsible for this and should take all the credit as it was he who pushed for trade union to be made legal. Trade union was made legal in 1825.

The forming of the police (1829) shows how the liberal Tories are quite liberal. The police force made order for the people and it meant that people were controlled in a better manor. Before the setting up of the police, the people were controlled by the yeomanry, who had a tendency to fight with the people who didn’t bring any order to the situations. However, the forming of the police meant that situations were dealt with in a more orderly fashion, and it was less likely for the police to attack the people like the yeomanry did in the peterloo massacre.

The introduction of free trade was another liberal action which made the Liberal Tories more liberal as it meant that supplies could be traded from other countries without having high import charges. This meant that the people paid less for food which was a plus side on their behalf as it meant food was more affordable.

It could also be argued that the Liberal Tories were very liberal; in comparison to the old government as the Liberal Tories were responsible for reforms, such as the reform of the penal code. They were also responsible for free trade; this meant that tax wouldn’t be charged on importations.
 
Www: You have a lot of valid points, you have explained them well
 
Ebi: Refer back to the dates to when specific events had happened. To explain more about the other Tories: George Canning, William Husskison
 
Grade: B/C

Cherie Barr(Dart_07BarChe) 
Paige Byford
How liberal were the Liberal Tory reforms 1822-29?

The Liberal Tories was familiarized by the Prime Minster Lord Liverpool in 1822 to form a non-aristocratic party who consisted of 4 main leaders; Robert Peel, William Huskinsson, Fredrick Robinson and George Canning. Individually these people changed the ways of the government, helping the working class’s society by making them as important to humanity by equal rights, this made them impressively liberal, compared to 1815-1822 Tories.

Robert Peel the home secretary made a huge impact to the public by introducing authority and efficiency, firstly the Reform of the Penal Code meaning many crimes that faced the death penalty were changed to a more reasonable punishment for a minor crime which leads to another important act which was the change of Jails (Geols) which altered by government paying and sentences carried out. Guards were civil, inside jail you were treated equal. in the community’s eyes this could be seen to make it more humane but this could be argued Peel only done it to be efficient and seem liberal, Another vital proposal Peel made was the setting up of the Metropolitan police, unlike the late Tories Peel recognized that there needed to be a new authority instead of the Yeomanry and Spy’s in 1829 volunteers of the public offered to become part of the Metropolitan police creating less crime and later became a great success to many countries. Overall Robert Peel made some good liberal choices but wasn’t very liberal himself and only done it for effectiveness and not human rights.

All of the Liberal Tory’s viewed free trade as a good thing, but one in particular paid a great interest towards this was William Huskinsson the president of the board of trades. He was very Liberal by making acts such as the Navigation Acts in 1822 which aloud British ships and other countries to interact and trade goods without taxing making it cheaper to buy food and necessities for the working class, later on Huskinsson made this a law meaning price of supplies fell after the 1815-1822 cause of discontent Taxation. Overall William Huskinsson was very Liberal as he helped poverty on the working class and changed recent problems, Another Tories importance to free trade is Fredrick Robinson who bring wealth to the lower class, he made 4 new rules which were taxes on carriages and servants, banned of taxation on everyday items, taxing cut on smaller houses and customs duties lowered. Although some of these didn’t affect the working class people, they helped by the government having money from rich for other things, and reducing poverty to the ones that did effect the poorer making him very liberal.

Other important Liberal Choices made by the Liberal Tories were Catholic Emancipation by Robert peel meaning giving Catholics the right to become important figures in society and having a right in parliament. Another being creating trade unions which made British imports cheaper and having a friendship with other countries, these choices were both very liberal and played a big part to the nature of the working class.

 

Haven’t done conclusion

.C+

Www you are beginning to develop the right structure to these qs ... Answer in first paragraph then attempt to prove/discuss answer... Good attempt to keep referring to the q throughout

Ebi .. When finished in should achieve a B ... However to go further you need to analyse more closely what is meant by liberal

Lit ... Spell check please ... Rather a lot of typos and errors
 

Paige Byford

How liberal were the Liberal Tory reforms 1822-29?

The Liberal Tories was familiarized by the Prime Minster Lord Liverpool in 1822 to form a non-aristocratic party who consisted of 4 main leaders; Robert Peel, William Huskinsson, Fredrick Robinson and George Canning. Individually these people changed the ways of the government, helping the working class’s society by making them as important to humanity by equal rights, this made them impressively liberal, compared to 1815-1822 Tories.

Robert Peel the home secretary made a huge impact to the public by introducing authority and efficiency, firstly the Reform of the Penal Code meaning many crimes that faced the death penalty were changed to a more reasonable punishment for a minor crime which leads to another important act which was the change of Jails (Geols) which altered by government paying and sentences carried out. Guards were civil, inside jail you were treated equal. in the community’s eyes this could be seen to make it more humane but this could be argued Peel only done it to be efficient and seem liberal, Another vital proposal Peel made was the setting up of the Metropolitan police, unlike the late Tories Peel recognized that there needed to be a new authority instead of the Yeomanry and Spy’s in 1829 volunteers of the public offered to become part of the Metropolitan police creating less crime and later became a great success to many countries. Overall Robert Peel made some good liberal choices but wasn’t very liberal himself and only done it for effectiveness and not human rights.

All of the Liberal Tory’s viewed free trade as a good thing, but one in particular paid a great interest towards this was William Huskinsson the president of the board of trades. He was very Liberal by making acts such as the Navigation Acts in 1822 which aloud British ships and other countries to interact and trade goods without taxing making it cheaper to buy food and necessities for the working class, later on Huskinsson made this a law meaning price of supplies fell after the 1815-1822 cause of discontent Taxation. Overall William Huskinsson was very Liberal as he helped poverty on the working class and changed recent problems, Another Tories importance to free trade is Fredrick Robinson who bring wealth to the lower class, he made 4 new rules which were taxes on carriages and servants, banned of taxation on everyday items, taxing cut on smaller houses and customs duties lowered. Although some of these didn’t affect the working class people, they helped by the government having money from rich for other things, and reducing poverty to the ones that did effect the poorer making him very liberal

Other important Liberal Choices made by the Liberal Tories were Catholic Emancipation by Robert peel meaning giving Catholics the right to become important figures in society and having a right in parliament which became official in 1829 and was led by Daniel O’Connell this was possibly one of the most famous reforms as it aloud different religions to be together in the rights for the first time in Britain. Another being creating trade unions which made British imports cheaper and having a friendship with other countries after the Corn Laws, these choices were both very liberal and played a big part to the nature of the working class, George Canning also played a vast role to making the liberal Tories liberal, he was the man who effectively changed the economy, and he did this by getting access to markets in forging countries which he was able to start a trade with to increase food supplies and increased wealth in Britain.

To conclude the liberal Tories each individually made a number of reforms that they thought would either be efficient or prevent poverty making them very liberal in different ways, some made the poorest people able to come out of poverty such as the reducing of duties act by William Huskinsson and others made public places better such as Robert Peel and Gaols and the Metropolitan police, both and more of these reforms made Britain a greater place to live in, but some failed to help.

 


Paige Byford(Dart_07ByfPai) 

How liberal were the liberal tory reforms 1822-1829?

How liberal were the liberal Tory reforms 1822-29 chemas-microsoft-comSurprisedfficeSurprisedffice" />

You could say the liberal Tories were quite liberal but that’s not necessarily true they were fairly liberal . The liberal Tories were about individualism they believe you had a right to free and do how you pleased but they believed your freedom could only be up to a certain extent you could only be free until it started to affect others. The liberal Tories and the reforms that they made were considered to be benefitting the working class because they no longer had to pay for the taxes on the food as that law had be abolished .// Whigs introduced a bill for parliamentary reform in 1822 and unfortunately there was no support from the government and the bill failed . Another issue that made the liberal Tories fairly liberal was the word Religion . Roman Catholics were allowed to vote but they weren’t allowed to be MP’s or hold public office .// This is where lord Liverpool links in he was the prime minister at this time . He knew that the king and the members of the tory party didn’t want change so he decided that the cabinet should ignore this issue this is where they contradicted themselves they believe in freedom being able to do what you wanted as long as you didn’t affect anyone’s freedom . Roman Catholics should be able to run for MP’S as they are doing what they want and not affecting anyone.

However during 1822- 29 the liberal Tories introduced plenty of reforms. One reform was the free trade. William Huskisson and Fredrick Robinson believed that Britain's trade was hampered by old and outdated regulations. An example was the Navigation Acts.Huskisson believed in free trade. In this Huskisson and Robinson were influenced by merchants and industrialists (the new middle class) who thought tariffs, duties and taxes on goods encouraged other countries to raise tariffs. In 1823 Huskisson persuaded parliament to pass the Reciprocity (exchanging goods) of Goods Act. This allowed the British Government to make agreements with other countries whereby Britain would get rid of such restrictions on trade with a particular country if the other country agreed to do the same.  Robinson and William eased the tax burden on the poor by cancelling various taxes put on essential commodities including coal, wool, and rum. This benefited the poor working classes both in the sense of living and working conditions.  William had the brains about free trade and Robinson had the power so they combined their skills together and the outcome was good because it benefitted the working class there for this is a liberal reform . This allowed Britain to prosper after all they did call Robinson prosperity Robison. In addition the duties on all over goods fell from 50% to 20% which effectively benefitted the working class as they were in poverty when the corn laws were introduced because of the taxes of the necessities.

Furthermore  because the habeas corpus was banned  and the yeomanry where put in charge of dealing with people who misbehaved e.g. people who started protests  Robert peel introduced the metropolitan police . He had gotten parliaments permission for this as well as coming up with the reform of the penal code which was made up of a number of different laws . This allowed less people being hanged and more people being sent to a concentration camps  in Australia where they had to work hard .
B/C
www. a very good attempt to cover the bulk of the reforms - with some attempt (though not sustained) to assess how liberal they were
ebi - cover the reforms chronologically because their context is important to the evaluation
lit - // = new paragraph needed

 

How liberal were the liberal tory reforms 1822-1829?           Rachel Balogun

 

How liberal were the liberal Tory reforms 1822-29

You could say the liberal Tories were quite liberal but that’s not necessarily true they were fairly liberal . The liberal Tories were about individualism they believe you had a right to free and do how you pleased but they believed your freedom could only be up to a certain extent you could only be free until it started to affect others. The liberal Tories and the reforms that they made were considered to be benefitting the working class because they no longer had to pay for the taxes on the food as that law had be abolished . Whigs introduced a bill for parliamentary reform in 1822 and unfortunately there was no support from the government and the bill failed . Another issue that made the liberal Tories fairly liberal was the word Religion . Roman Catholics were allowed to vote but they weren’t allowed to be MP’s or hold public office . This is where lord Liverpool links in he was the prime minister at this time . He knew that the king and the members of the tory party didn’t want change so he decided that the cabinet should ignore this issue this is where they contradicted themselves they believe in freedom being able to do what you wanted as long as you didn’t affect anyone’s freedom . Roman Catholics should be able to run for MP’S as they are doing what they want and not affecting anyone.

However during 1822- 29 the liberal Tories introduced plenty of reforms. One reform was the free trade. William Huskisson and Fredrick Robinson believed that Britain's trade was hampered by old and outdated regulations. An example was the Navigation Acts.Huskisson believed in free trade. In this Huskisson and Robinson were influenced by merchants and industrialists (the new middle class) who thought tariffs, duties and taxes on goods encouraged other countries to raise tariffs. In 1823 Huskisson persuaded parliament to pass the Reciprocity (exchanging goods) of Goods Act. This allowed the British Government to make agreements with other countries whereby Britain would get rid of such restrictions on trade with a particular country if the other country agreed to do the same. Robinson and William eased the tax burden on the poor by cancelling various taxes put on essential commodities including coal, wool, and rum. This benefited the poor working classes both in the sense of living and working conditions. William had the brains about free trade and Robinson had the power so they combined their skills together and the outcome was good because it benefitted the working class there for this is a liberal reform . This allowed Britain to prosper after all they did call Robinson prosperity Robison. In addition the duties on all over goods fell from 50% to 20% which effectively benefitted the working class as they were in poverty when the corn laws were introduced because of the taxes of the necessities.

Furthermore because the habeas corpus was banned and the yeomanry where put in charge of dealing with people who misbehaved e.g. people who started protests Robert peel introduced the metropolitan police . He had gotten parliaments permission for this as well as coming up with the reform of the penal code which was made up of a number of different laws . This allowed less people being hanged and more people being sent to a concentration camps in Australia where they had to work hard.// From before the 1800’s the punishment for crime was death which a lot of people feared . Most things were punishable by death this was what had the power in making people afraid over the small offences they had committed. There was no justifying it if you was given a death penalty you was going to die but with the reform of the penal code and the goals act which came into power in 1823 . The goals act meant that instead of giving people death penalties they were sent to jail which meant there was now suitable punishment when offences were committed  . This shows some reform in the way crime and punishment was handled . The goals act meant that jail conditions were improved because they were given basic education even though they were in jail for committing an offence this showed how liberal the liberal Tories were . Not only did it change the perception of the way punishment was handled in Britain but some of the changes that were made back then are still around e.g. they still offer education in jails .This allowed people to see how liberal the liberal Tories were compared to the pervious cabinet because it favored the working class it put most people out of their misery that had been suppressed . As well as the Corn Laws adjustment it showed how the government could be liberal but it doesn’t show they had entirely become liberal because they didn’t make it so it was suitable for everyone mostly the working class.

 www: There is a lot of evidence such as facts and key dates that back up how liberal the liberal tories were. Also, the structure of the way it is written shows that you have a clear knowledge and understanding of the tories and their reforms. Everything was described with detail and various liberal tories were spoken about.
ebi: You challenged Robert Peels reforms as his reforms were more efficient rather than liberal; this would support your answer in the first paragraph whereby you stated that the tories were 'quite'/'fairly' liberal.
Grade: B (high b)


Rachel Balogun(Dart_06BalRac) 

How Liberal were the Liberal Tories?

Aaliyah adenijichemas-microsoft-comSurprisedfficeSurprisedffice" />

12T

History practice assessment

 

How liberal were the liberal Tories (1822-1929)?

 

 

To start with, the liberal Tories were only quite liberal due to reasons associating with the distinction between whether or not the reforms were in fact liberal or efficient. In addition, Lord Liverpool, still prime minister at the time of liberal reforms, rebuilt his cabinet by finding new people to fill in important positions within the government. Unlike the years 1815-1822, Lord Liverpool took a different approach to how the government was to be run and how situations would be dealt with. Lord Liverpool’s finding of the following people made a momentum difference to how society was handled and improved the liberality of Britain: George Canning (of who assisted Lord Liverpool with the need of change and introduction of liberal reforms), William Huskisson, Frederick ‘prosperity’ Robinson and Robert peel.

 

Firstly, George Canning was foreign secretary of the cabinet and made an effective contribution to the recovery of the economy. He did this by achieving access into profitable markets located in South America in such countries like Buenos Aires, Mexico and Colombia. By recognising these three independent states, Canning was able to gain a trading advantage with them of which entitled the growth of economic prosperity in Britain to rise and increase the wealth of both the working classes and aristocracy societies. George canning was successful within this decision and recovery of the economy upon various other solutions he found to specific problems. For instance, due to his secured position of foreign secretary, canning was able to implement new reforms and ideas associated with other countries of which not only benefited him and his life, but also benefitted the lower, middle and upper classes. //At one point between 1822 and 1829, canning supported and assisted in the campaign of the abolition of slavery.  This accentuates his liberality as stopping slavery just goes to show how selfless his ideas and decisions were. By abolishing slavery, it gave those who were once slaves the freedom to become who they want to be and start working proper jobs rather than suffering at the feet of those who over-ruled them as individuals. Not only did his support in the campaign support the slaves themselves, but it also surprisingly supported the upper classes and aristocrats. This is because in the 1800s taxes were put on slaves of whom the upper classes had to try and keep up with and pay in order to keep the slaves. By abolishing slavery, the rich sectors of society were able to save money and use it for other purposes. To summarise the case of George Canning and his reforms, he was very successful. The reason behind this judgment is that he was an individual by which means his ideas were his own; they were original. Just this conclusion is enough to show that he was in fact a liberal tory and did not just make economic enhancing reforms or ideas simply for efficiency. Moreover, his actions were liberal as they aided in the start of great economic prosperity of which greatly benefited the economy by increasing the wealth of Britain. An example of enhanced economic prosperity would be a man named Frederick Robinson.

 

To start with, Frederick Robinson, also known as Frederick ‘prosperity ‘Robinson or ‘Goody’ increased the economies prosperity as hinted at within his nickname. Frederick Robinson entered the cabinet as the President of The Board of Trade. He was also made Chancellor of the Exchequer in which is the term given to a royal or national treasury of which were responsible for the funds of the British government. The main contributions Robinson made to the increase the prosperity of Britain was the introduction of four main reforms all associated with the reduction of taxes put onto a variety of much needed necessities  essential to a standard life in Britain. His first reform was conducted in 1823 whereby Robinson reduced or even repealed the taxes put on carriages and servants. However, one may argue that a disadvantage of this reform was that it mainly was to an advantage towards the richest of people as they were the classes who were accessible to the pleasure of affording patients. The second reform was conducted in 1824 of which Robinson eased the tax burden on the poor by cancelling various taxes put on essential commodities including coal, wool, and rum. This benefited the poor working classes both in the sense of living and working conditions. His third reform conducted in 1825 improved the lives of working classes. This is because he cancelled the house and window taxes that were put on the smaller houses. By doing this, Robinson increased the likelihood of those living in smaller houses to be able to afford them and remain living there, lowering their chances of living on the harsh streets, in poverty due to not being able to pay their taxes.

 

 

 www. some very sound K and U of canning and robinson. I particualrly like the depth of discussion which if sustain across a full answer would be heading for a top grade
 
ebi - you're only half way through the task so this is reflected in your grade
 
lit - // = new parargraph

Aaliyah Adeniji(Dart_07AdeAal) 

How liberal were the Liberal Tories?chemas-microsoft-comSurprisedfficeSurprisedffice" />

To begin with, The Liberal Tories were relatively liberal; the Tories were during 1822-29 and were introduced by the prime minister of Britain, Lord Liverpool. Before the Liberal Tories the government was disliked so he thought that there should be a change in Britain so he decided to change his government by presenting a new cabinet containing the following head aristocrats; Robert Peel, William Huskinsson, Fredrick Robinson and George Canning. Individually these people helped Lord Liverpool develop the government and tried to make it even more liberal. The Tory party was a major factor in preventing the spread of revolution

Firstly, Robert Peel was announced into the cabinet in 1822 as he wanted to introduce reforms that would benefit theX working class (not really). Liberals believed in individualism and the right to be free to do as you pleased until the freedom began to affect others. These acts of freedom were known as ‘Inalienable rights’ which meant that it could not have been taken away by the people. Peel is perhaps best remembered for the establishment of the Metropolitan Police Force for London; this meant that crime in Britain reduced. The creation of the police was to patrol the capital and later on apply to the rest of the county. The ‘Bobbies’ or ‘Peelers’ as they were known attempted to control the crime in Britain. Before Peel and the Metropolitan Police, people would volunteer for the job, even though they weren’t full police officers, this was known as the yeomanry. Also, Peel introduced the reform of the Penal code which meant that the death penalty was abolished for over 180 offences. This meant that the Liberal Tories was rather liberal as they were successful in understanding the rights of people.

Secondly, another aristocrat that was important in the development of the Liberal Tories was William Huskinsson; who became President of the Board of Trade during 1823-27. Huskinsson believed in free trade between different countries, this would benefit the lower class. Also, this involved calming the Navigation Acts in 1822.
 
D
www. a good start to the essay with some good discussion of liberalism and Peel's reforms
ebi - it needs finishing and is very hard to grade accurately in its current state
 
 NEW VERSION

How liberal were the Liberal Tories?

To begin with, The Liberal Tories were relatively liberal; the Tories were during 1822-29 and were introduced by the prime minister of Britain, Lord Liverpool. Before the Liberal Tories the government was disliked so he thought that there should be a change in Britain so he decided to change his government by presenting a new cabinet containing the following head aristocrats; Robert Peel, William Huskinsson, Fredrick Robinson and George Canning. Individually these people helped Lord Liverpool develop the government and tried to make it even more liberal. The Tory party was a major factor in preventing the spread of revolution.

Firstly, Robert Peel was announced into the cabinet in 1822 and he and his Liberals believed in individualism and the right to be free to do as you pleased until the freedom began to affect others. These acts of freedom were known as ‘Inalienable rights’ which meant that it could not have been taken away by the people. Peel is perhaps best remembered for the establishment of the Metropolitan Police Force for London; this meant that crime in Britain reduced. The creation of the police was to patrol the capital and later on apply to the rest of the county. The ‘Bobbies’ or ‘Peelers’ as they were known attempted to control the crime in Britain. Before Peel and the Metropolitan Police, people would volunteer for the job, even though they weren’t full police officers, this was known as the yeomanry. Also, Peel introduced the reform of the Penal code which meant that the death penalty was abolished for over 180 offences. This meant that the Liberal Tories was rather liberal as they were successful in understanding the rights of people.

Secondly, another aristocrat that was important in the development of the Liberal Tories was William Huskinsson; who became President of the Board of Trade during 1823-27. Huskinsson believed in free trade between different countries, this would benefit the lower class. Also, this involved calming the Navigation Acts in 1822. William Huskinsson believed in free trade, and in 1824/25 he made a considerable drop in the price of everyday items, this would of benefitted everyone, however mainly the working class.

 

Thirdly, the Tories were quite Liberal as they developed Social, Domestic and Economic Reforms as in 1825 the Trade Unions were made legal by a man named Francis Place. This resulted in the working class could all work together and improve the conditions they were working in. However, there were some disadvantages to this as they were not allowed to cause any disturbance/protests, they were only allowed meetings. Another disadvantage is that the Tories were not actually the ones who passed the Trade Unions, it was Francis Place; a private individual. In 1829, The Liberal Tories voted for Catholic Emancipation; allowing Catholics the right to become MP’s or to hold other public offices. George Canning a huge role in the Tories also wanted freedom to the Catholics. Canning changed the economy and held responsible for the peace between Britain and other European countries. Peel and some of the other Tories refused to listen to him, and opposed to the idea of Catholic Emancipation, however, the government started to break up so the law was passed.

 

In conclusion, The Liberal Tories were relatively Liberal as individually people changed the government and prevented protest by introducing new laws to the government which resulted them in being highly successful which dealing with discontent through 1822-1829.
 
c
 
www:
jess, good understanding of a variety of reforms and the paragraphs are very detailed
 
ebi:
refer to the question at the end of each paragraph and state whether the chosen point was liberal or not

Jessica Baker(Dart_07BakJes) 

How Liberal were the Liberal Tories?

Charlotte Hunt 12T
Historychemas-microsoft-comSurprisedfficeSurprisedffice" />

How Liberal were the Liberal Tories?

 

The Liberal Tories were quite Liberal during the 1822 – 1829 periods as they had made many reforms in Liverpool’s Government, and he had to remain Prime Minister until 1827. He had a lot of younger men introduced into the cabinet which allowed them to put forward new ideas into the Government.

There a 4 man Tories during the time of Liverpool’s Government: George Canning Foreign Secretary, Robert Peel Home Secretary, William Huskinsson Board of Trade and Frederick Robinson Chancellor of the Exchequer.
Firstly, Robert peel introduced the Metropolitan Police in 1829 which gave order to the streets of Britain by doing this, this eliminated volunteers for the Yeomanry and Magistrates. In addition Peel had reformed the Penal Code which meant that the hundreds of laws that had been created for ridiculous crimes had been narrowed down to just 8. By doing this Liberal act resulted in people not being harshly punished for the crimes that they had committed. By doing these Liberal acts, Peel was made Prime Minister later on. Twice.

In addition to the Liberal acts that were being made by the Tories, William Huskinsson believed in free trade, and in 1824 and 1825 Huskinsson has made a significant drop in the price of duties which benefitted everyone, especially the working class as they were in poverty and duties were being put on everyday items such as: Silk and cotton. By doing this the duties had dropped by a staggering 20%.

George Canning who was the Foreign Secretary in Liverpool’s Government was in charge of keeping the peace between the countries and he was also allowed to assist in the economic recovery by achieving access to the profitable markets of South Africa. Canning also made Britain one of the first to recognise the independent states: Buenos Aries, Columbia and Mexico which then resulted in them gaining a trading advantage with them.

In 1825 they Trade Unions were made legal, by Francis Place, so the working class could come together and have meetings on how they can improve the conditions that they work in. However, they had limitations to what they were allowed to do. For instance they were not allowed to protest or cause havoc about their conditions they were only able to have meetings. However making Trade Unions legal was not an act of the Tories; it was made by a man known as Francis Place an ‘Independent MP’ and his idea was then passed by the Government.
B/C
www. - a good and broad coverage of many of the liberal tory measures with some good points of evaluation
ebi - it needs a conclusion to draw your argument together 
 
New Answer:
Charlotte Hunt 12T
History

How Liberal were the Liberal Tories?

The Liberal Tories were quite Liberal during the 1822 – 1829 periods as they had made many reforms in Liverpool’s Government, and he had to remain Prime Minister until 1827. He had a lot of younger men introduced into the cabinet which allowed them to put forward new ideas into the Government.

There a 4 man Tories during the time of Liverpool’s Government: George Canning Foreign Secretary, Robert Peel Home Secretary, William Huskinsson Board of Trade and Frederick Robinson Chancellor of the Exchequer.
Firstly, Robert peel introduced the Metropolitan Police in 1829 which gave order to the streets of Britain by doing this, this eliminated volunteers for the Yeomanry and Magistrates. In addition Peel had reformed the Penal Code which meant that the hundreds of laws that had been created for ridiculous crimes had been narrowed down to just 8. By doing this Liberal act resulted in people not being harshly punished for the crimes that they had committed. These Liberal acts soon made Peel Prime Minister, later on. Twice.

In addition to the Liberal acts that were being made by the Tories, William Huskinsson believed in free trade, and in 1824 and 1825 Huskinsson has made a significant drop in the price of duties which benefitted everyone, especially the working class as they were in poverty and duties were being put on everyday items such as: Silk and cotton. By doing this the duties had dropped by a staggering 20%.

George Canning who was the Foreign Secretary in Liverpool’s Government was in charge of keeping the peace between the countries and he was also allowed to assist in the economic recovery by achieving access to the profitable markets of South Africa. Canning also made Britain one of the first to recognise the independent states: Buenos Aries, Columbia and Mexico which then resulted in them gaining a trading advantage with them.

Later on, a man called Daniel O’Connell who was a Catholic MP from Ireland he was granted a seat into Parliament as the Government didn’t want the Irish to start up a revolt which could turn into more riots and would cause discontent towards the public. To avoid this they passed an act in 1829 called the Catholic Emancipation which gave the Roman Catholics the same rights to everyone else, and could mix with other cultures and work together. Although the Government did not want to do this they were practically forced into it.

In 1825 the Trade Unions were made legal, by Francis Place, so the working class could come together and have meetings on how they can improve the conditions that they work in. However, they had limitations to what they were allowed to do. For instance they were not allowed to protest or cause havoc about their conditions they were only able to have meetings. However making Trade Unions legal was not an act of the Tories; it was made by a man known as Francis Place an ‘Independent MP’ and his idea was then passed by the Government.

In conclusion the Liberal Tories had passed a number of beneficial acts; this mostly benefitted the poor working class as they had no money to spare. In my opinion, the most important act that was introduced was the reducing of the duties, as this made everyday household goods affordable for the average working class worker. It meant they were able to buy more goods for their families which they were never allowed to purchase as there was such a high demand of tax on each of the goods it was almost impossible to buy.
B+
WWW - you have covered a range of points and have a clear understandiong to the points
EBI - refer to the question at the end of each paragraph

Charlotte Hunt(Dart_07HunCha) 

How liberal where the Liberal Torieschemas-microsoft-comSurprisedfficeSurprisedffice" />

The Liberal Tories where seen as quite liberal. In 1822 Lord Liverpool constructed his cabinet, introducing new young men who were open to new ideas in reform, whereas the old Tories had repressed each protest and had not taken the discontent of the working class into account. The start of the liberal reform came after George Canning had replaced Castlereagh in the department of foreign sectary; Canning recognised a need for limited reform and was supported by Liverpool and the rest of his cabinet. By creating these reforms the idea was to improve society and the discontent of the working class as they were scared at what the protests would lead to next, especially after the French Revolution had bought spectacle views to the British public, giving the idea the reform was made in protection of the Tories and not because they wanted to be more equal with the working class.

Lord Liverpool had selected new authorities who made great contribution to the Liberal Tories becoming more in favour of freedom and equality. One of these men of authority was Robert Peel, who became home secretary in 1822. However, Robert Peel could be questioned as to how liberal he was, Peel introduced the Metropolitan police which meant that there was now a formed organised police force under regulations –  as Harbeus Corpus was taken out of suspension – meaning the yeomanry (volunteers), who where employed by the government to arrest and kill in radical positions, where taken over by an orginised police force where a criminal act was now investigated and not just accused and imprisoned with no rights of speach. With the Metro Police force new laws where enlisted, being less harsh on what law would lead to execution however many more laws stated you were deported to Australia which was used as the British ‘dumping ground’ for their problems which they did not want to deal with. This idea shows the Liberal Tories to be not as liberal as they come across, these ‘criminals’ could have been imprisoned instead of with no choice deported. On the other hand, Peel also introduced the Gail Act which delivered inspections into prisons, segregation between men and women and the Guards became funded by the government instead of the prisoners having to pay in order to be treated with human respect, this reform made life for prisoners more humane.  evaluate here

William Huskinson became president as board of trade in 1823. Huskinson brought the idea of free trade into practice by making reductions on tax on trade goods; the idea of trading without duties and taxes was to reduce the level of tax on foods, which became great help to the working class as the cost of living also reduced. When trading was cheaper, Britain had hoped more countries would trade with them, meaning more products, higher profits and broadening businesses. The Free trade had then benefited both the high and low social class in great ways, broadening businesses would reduce unemployment as people would need more workers, as unemployment was a great cause of anger this reduced the discontent of the working class meaning less protests would occur showing the liberal Tories to be successful in this choice. If the working man became less discontent then surely the Liberal Tories where being highly liberal to create this change, however, some could argue that the idea of free trade could have been to raise the profits for the aristocrats and it was a coincidence that the working class had benefited from this reform.

Francis Place was an independent MP who also contributed into the social reform; he gave the idea of legalising trade unions to the government who then passed this law. Trade unions are organisations of workers who unite together in order to achieve common goals, such as, higher pay, health and safety etc. This had became legal in 1825 after being illegal since 1799, the trade unions, although seen as a good contribution, was limited by the government that meetings is as far as the unions could go, being able to speak out through stike or protest continued to stay illegal. This shows the Liberal Tories have only small contribution into being liberal as firstly it was not their idea and became limited, however they did pass the law, giving consideration to working class.

To conclude, the Liberal Tories contributed small amounts to being liberal. They were highly successful in ending discontent, and made limited reforms which did benefit the working class…
B
www. well structured and well argued response - with clear K and U and clear and consistent assessment
ebi - you have missed out Cathoilc emancipation and the Test and corporations act
NEW ANSWER

How liberal where the Liberal Tories

The Liberal Tories where seen as quite liberal. In 1822 Lord Liverpool constructed his cabinet, introducing new young men who were open to new ideas in reform, whereas the old Tories had repressed each protest and had not taken the discontent of the working class into account. The start of the liberal reform came after George Canning had replaced Castlereagh in the department of foreign sectary; Canning recognised a need for limited reform and was supported by Liverpool and the rest of his cabinet. By creating these reforms the idea was to improve society and the discontent of the working class as they were scared at what the protests would lead to next, especially after the French Revolution had bought spectacle views to the British public, giving the idea the reform was made in protection of the Tories and not because they wanted to be more equal with the working class.

Lord Liverpool had selected new authorities who made great contribution to the Liberal Tories becoming more in favour of freedom and equality. One of these men of authority was Robert Peel, who became home secretary in 1822. However, Robert Peel could be questioned as to how liberal he was, Peel introduced the Metropolitan police which meant that there was now a formed organised police force under regulations – Harbeus Corpus was taken out of suspension – meaning the yeomanry, volunteers who were employed by the government to arrest and kill in radical positions, where taken over by an organised police force where a criminal act was now investigated and not just accused and imprisoned with no rights of speech. With the Metro Police force new laws where enlisted, being less harsh on what law would lead to execution however many more laws stated you were deported to Australia which was used as the British ‘dumping ground’ for their problems which they did not want to deal with. This idea shows the Liberal Tories to be not as liberal as they come across, these ‘criminals’ could have been imprisoned instead of with no choice deported. On the other hand, Peel also introduced the Gail Act which delivered inspections into prisons, segregation between men and women and the Guards became funded by the government instead of the prisoners having to pay in order to be treated with human respect, this reform made life for prisoners more humane.  Overall, the organisation which was developed by Peel had given a successful decrease of discontent for the working class; however, Peel was against reform for the working class and therefore just wanted to make the organisation of dealing with crime more efficient, reflected well on Britain and himself. Due to Robert Peel not being a liberal man, his actions, although created more liberal reform, where not intently in favour of the working men.

William Huskinson became president as board of trade in 1823. Huskinson brought the idea of free trade into practice by making reductions on tax on trade goods; the idea of trading without duties and taxes was to reduce the level of tax on foods, which became great help to the working class as the cost of living also reduced. When trading was cheaper, Britain had hoped more countries would trade with them, meaning more products, higher profits and broadening businesses. The Free trade had then benefited both the high and low social class in great ways, broadening businesses would reduce unemployment as people would need more workers, as unemployment was a great cause of anger this reduced the discontent of the working class meaning less protests would occur showing the liberal Tories to be successful in this choice. If the working man became less discontent then surely the Liberal Tories where being highly liberal to create this change, however, some could argue that the idea of free trade could have been to raise the profits for the aristocrats and it was a coincidence that the working class had benefited from this reform.

Francis Place was an independent MP who also contributed into the social reform; he gave the idea of legalising trade unions to the government who then passed this law. Trade unions are organisations of workers who unite together in order to achieve common goals, such as, higher pay, health and safety etc. This had become legal in 1825 after being illegal since 1799, the trade unions, although seen as a good contribution, was limited by the government that meetings is as far as the unions could go, being able to speak out through strike or protest continued to stay illegal. This shows the Liberal Tories have only small contribution into being liberal as firstly it was not their idea and became limited, however they did pass the law, giving consideration to working class.

In 1829 Catholic Emancipation law was passed as Wellington was in the seat of Prime Minister. Catholic emancipation meant that all Catholics would have the same rights as people connected with the Church of England. However the idea was not Wellington’s or any of the ‘liberal Tories’ as they were together against the idea of rights for Catholics, in fact a Irish lawyer named O’Connell was voted into MP during the County Clair election and it was he who forced the idea upon Wellington. The Irish lawyer did this by encouraging the Irish public that they are in favour of equal rights and that they should follow him in the idea of Catholic Emancipation. Wellington then became fearful that he would no longer have control over the Irish community and then passed the law, which created an even bigger split between the Liberal and the Ultra Tories, which indicates the Tories to not be as liberal as they would like to perceive, giving that the majority are not in favour of freedom and equal, they still want the aristocrats to dominate the country.

The Liberal and the Ultra Tories began to split as the idea of the Test and Corporation act was discussed within the Liberal Tories in 1828. The Test and Corporation act meant that people who were not a part of the Church of England (Protestants) would have equal rights as those who are. This act shows a liberal action for the reformed Tories as it was an idea which came from them…

 

To conclude, the Liberal Tories contributed small amounts to being liberal. They were highly successful in ending discontent, and made limited reforms which did benefit the working class…

 B
WWW - you have writen about the Catholic empancipation act and the test and coporations act and have discussed them both effectively. You have explained what they did and the reforms they enforced as well as identifying what each individual does.
EBI - add more to your conclsion

Bobbie-Jo Bonello(DART_07bobbie-JoBonello) 

How Liberal were the Liberal Tories?

The Liberal Tories were quite liberal in the years 1822-1829 when they were in power. They did many things which benefitted the working class and made many reforms such as the reform of the penal code and free trade. Lord Liverpool led the Liberal Tories until he died in 1827, then they were taken over by George Canning. chemas-microsoft-comSurprisedfficeSurprisedffice" />

 

Robert Peel was responsible for a few of the reforms in the years 1822-1829, one of which was the Penal Code. He became home secretary in 1822 and died in 1850. Peel is known for the set up of the metropolitan police – the first ever police force formed. The metropolitan police are still a force used now and was a good way to reduce crime. Before the metropolitan police force, there was the yeomanry, which was a group of men aiming to protect their areas. The yeomanry are known for the Peterloo Massacre where they injured over 400 people and killed 11. The reform of the Penal Code was an important reform and was a very Liberal thing to do, as the laws already in action were very old and some were completely inappropriate, which meant that the system became less effective – there were over 200 crimes with a death penalty. Peel got rid of many laws and made the penal code a lot simpler: he reduced what had been hundreds of laws to just 8. Peel cut down the amount of offences for which you could be hanged - for many of those offences the penalty would be transportation to chemas-microsoft-comSurprisedfficeConfusedmarttags" />ountry-region wConfusedt="on">Australiaountry-region>: By the late 1820’s, over 5, 000 convicts a year were being transported to ountry-region wConfusedt="on">t="on">Australiaountry-region>. The option of transportation was more humane and also pretty permanent – yet, Peel was not a great humanitarian. If anything, Peel wanted the law to be stricter - have more punishment enforced and get more people convicted. The reform of the penal code and the founding of the metropolitan police was a very liberal thing to do, because before these, the punishment for crimes were ridiculous and just resulted in hangings. The Penal code changed this and made the punishments more rational and fair to the criminals and gave them rights when they had been arrested. In 1823 the Jails (Gaoles) act was also introduced. This meant that there would now be separate prisons for men and for women and that prisoners would be able to have some education. Prisons were to be inspected and be clean, good conditions for the prisoners. Before this act, prisons were unregulated, filthy and inhumane places.

 

Another reform was Free Trade. William Huskisson believed in free trade and in this, Huskisson and Frederick Robinson were influenced by merchants and industrialists (the new middle class) who thought tariffs, duties and taxes on goods encouraged other countries to raise tariffs. Free traders believe that goods should be traded between countries without any duties or taxes being charged and that free trade would lead to more trade and therefore greater prosperity for everyone.
 
D
www. really good discussion of peels reforms with a clear assessment of the question shining through
ebi - not much else covered which would adversely affect your grade - finish it and I will remark
 

How liberal were the Liberal Tories?

 

The Liberal Tories were quite liberal in the years 1822-1829 when they were in power. They did many things which benefitted the working class and made many reforms such as the reform of the penal code and free trade. Lord Liverpool led the Liberal Tories until he died in 1827, then they were taken over by George Canning. There were four main men in the Liberal Tories: William Huskisson -President as Board of Trade, George Canning – Foreign Secretary, Frederick ‘Prosperity’ Robinson - Chancellor of the Exchequer and Robert Peel - Home Secretary.

 

Robert Peel was responsible for a few of the reforms in the years 1822-1829, one of which was the Penal Code. He became home secretary in 1822 and died in 1850. Peel is known for the set up of the metropolitan police – the first ever police force formed. The metropolitan police are still a force used now and was a good way to reduce crime. Before the metropolitan police force, there was the yeomanry, which was a group of men aiming to protect their areas. The yeomanry are known for the Peterloo Massacre where they injured over 400 people and killed 11. The reform of the Penal Code was an important reform and was a very Liberal thing to do, as the laws already in action were very old and some were completely inappropriate, which meant that the system became less effective – there were over 200 crimes with a death penalty. Peel got rid of many laws and made the penal code a lot simpler: he reduced what had been hundreds of laws to just 8. Peel cut down the amount of offences for which you could be hanged - for many of those offences the penalty would be transportation to ountry-region wConfusedt="on">Australiaountry-region>: By the late 1820’s, over 5, 000 convicts a year were being transported to ountry-region wConfusedt="on">t="on">Australiaountry-region>. The option of transportation was more humane and also pretty permanent – yet, Peel was not a great humanitarian. If anything, Peel wanted the law to be stricter - have more punishment enforced and get more people convicted. The reform of the penal code and the founding of the metropolitan police was a very liberal thing to do, because before these, the punishment for crimes were ridiculous and just resulted in hangings. The Penal code changed this and made the punishments more rational and fair to the criminals and gave them rights when they had been arrested. In 1823 the Jails (Gaoles) act was also introduced. This meant that there would now be separate prisons for men and for women and that prisoners would be able to have some education. Prisons were to be inspected and be clean, good conditions for the prisoners. Before this act, prisons were unregulated, filthy and inhumane places.

 

Another reform was Free Trade. William Huskisson believed in free trade and in this, Huskisson and Frederick Robinson were influenced by merchants and industrialists (the new middle class) who thought tariffs, duties and taxes on goods encouraged other countries to raise tariffs. Free traders believe that goods should be traded between countries without any duties or taxes being charged and that free trade would lead to more trade and therefore greater prosperity for everyone. Free Trade was a liberal act because it meant that Britain could get more food and not have to pay taxes on it, which would lead to less poverty because people wouldn’t be poor because of them having to pay taxes on the food they were getting.

 

There were many other reforms made when the Liberal Tories were in power, and another reform was Catholic Emancipation in 1829. Catholic Emancipation was an act which meant that Roman Catholics could have the same rights as any other person in Britain. When this was enacted it meant that Roman Catholics were then allowed to be involved with the government and run for MP, become judges etc. Roman Catholics didn’t have this right in the first place because Lord Liverpool did not think that they deserved it because he didn’t believe the same things as them. Catholic Emancipation was a Liberal thing to do because before, Roman Catholics didn’t have the same rights as other people, and this meant that they were equal to others and had the same chance to be a part of their government and their country.

 

Trade Union was also a reform made by the Liberal Tories. This meant that working class could now have meetings and people representing them and they could stand up for their rights. Before the Trade Union act, being represented and having secret meetings about work and people’s rights was illegal, because the previous government was worried that they would turn out in protests. This meant that the Liberal Tories were quite liberal for this act as it meant that the working class had rights and better conditions.

 

In conclusion, the Liberal Tories were very Liberal for many reforms they made and many things they did to help the people of Britain. The Government made reforms which would help people of a different religion, people who are living in poverty and even people who had committed crimes, giving them better conditions to stay in.
 
C+
www: Good points made, and good understanding of the Liberal Tories
ebi: If the conclusion was expanded and draw your argument together.

Jemma Wilson(Dart_07WilJem) 

How liberal were the liberal tory reforms 1822-1829?chemas-microsoft-comSurprisedfficeSurprisedffice" />

The Liberal Tories were quite liberal. There was 4 members which contributed to the construction of the Liberal Tories and these were Robert Peel, he was in charge of the metropolitan police. Another man called George Canning assisted economic recovery, made Britain the first to recognise the independent states and  Frederick Robison and William Huskisson both believed in trade and wanted people to be maintain good lives for themselves, therefore encouraged people to indulge in trade.

However you could argue making their decisions as a government were weak. In the early 1820’s free trade encouraged many people to make their own living. Nonetheless, the navigations Act was passed in 1822 landing the economy in ruins because of trade, this put a barrier against people trying to import goods to other country and stocks being imported back to Britain. People lost out on their profit and discontent spread. The Corn Laws which were enforced in 1815 meant that people who did involve themselves in trade were allowed to keep the profits they made.

Following the death of Lord Liverpool in 1828, there was much emphasis placed upon the Corn laws which kept the working class people more satisfied as prices dropped and people were able to fend for themselves, and buy essentials that they needed. The liberal Tories took a chance and tried to understand how people were feeling and why they were so against them. The Liberal Tories proved their understanding side by making working conditions for people better and made the age for children to work higher, so they could have an education.

As Robert Peel, leader of the metropolitan police, realised many people were now happier about the conditions their life was generally like they then realised crime rates dropped dramatically therefore another reform was enforced. Peel introduced the reform of the penal code and this enabled people to become more civilised with the government. It also meant that execution was removed and people were given punishments that were appropriate for the crime they committed. There was less crime this highlights that there was not as much rebellion against the government. The execution was not removed but was not given out so harshly, only for more relevant crimes.. explain that instead of execution the criminals where mainly seant to australia, which was used like a dumping ground meaning he was ignoring and just abolishing problems instead of solving them, explain what he could have done instead.

In conclusion, yes, the Liberal Tories were liberal in some aspects as they did try to understand what the working-class people and the upper-class people wanted. The government tried to make as many people happy as they could and this was an improvement to the government than in 1815-1822 because they did not take in to consideration people needs and dealt with the mayhem which ended in more frustration for protestors. However, individually they all contributed aspects of what they thought life should be like and as individuals their opinions were stronger to prove this was, Robert Peel and the Metropolitan police and there was George Canning who identified they needed to make people feel better about life. Then, there was also William Huskisson and Frederick Robison who made people take charge of their own lives and it represented freedom as they were their own boss and they were satisfied because they had no one else to blame as they are working for themselves. However their government decisions were weak.
 
C -
WWW: you have stated some reforms which had taken place and motive for why a reform had taken place.
EBI: you could explain further on what Peel and refur more to the dates 1822-29 as in the question. Also you could explain further on other liberal tories and how liberal they where e.g: William Huskinson, Robbinson, Canning... Also Francis Place and Catholic emancipation - was not introduced by the tories so question how liberal they where.

Simran Sandhu(Dart_07SanSim) 

How liberal were the liberal tory reforms 1822-1829?chemas-microsoft-comSurprisedfficeSurprisedffice" />

The Liberal Tories were quite liberal. There was 4 members which contributed to the construction of the Liberal Tories and these were Robert Peel, he was in charge of the metropolitan police. Another man called George Canning assisted economic recovery, made Britain the first to recognise the independent states and  Frederick Robison and William Huskisson both believed in trade and wanted people to be maintain good lives for themselves, therefore encouraged people to indulge in trade.

However you could argue making their decisions as a government were weak. In the early 1820’s free trade encouraged many people to make their own living. Nonetheless, the navigations Act was passed in 1822 landing the economy in ruins because of trade, this put a barrier against people trying to import goods to other country and stocks being imported back to Britain. People lost out on their profit and discontent spread. The Corn Laws which were enforced in 1815 meant that people who did involve themselves in trade were allowed to keep the profits they made.

Following the death of Lord Liverpool in 1828, there was much emphasis placed upon the Corn laws which kept the working class people more satisfied as prices dropped and people were able to fend for themselves, and buy essentials that they needed. The liberal Tories took a chance and tried to understand how people were feeling and why they were so against them. The Liberal Tories proved their understanding side by making working conditions for people better and made the age for children to work higher, so they could have an education.

As Robert Peel, leader of the metropolitan police, realised many people were now happier about the conditions their life was generally like they then realised crime rates dropped dramatically therefore another reform was enforced. Peel introduced the reform of the penal code and this enabled people to become more civilised with the government. It also meant that execution was removed and people were given punishments that were appropriate for the crime they committed. There was less crime this highlights that there was not as much rebellion against the government.

 

Trade unions were a way that people could keep each other informed about certain aspects of event which benefited them – the working class and the upper class. Trade unions became banned as there was too many of them and this caused the government chaos to deal with therefore their resolution was to no longer tolerate it and banned in 1825.

 

The catholic emancipation act was very liberal of the liberal Tories and this was because this granted freedom for the Roman Catholics from discrimination. Catholicism was looked upon negatively and they were not allowed to uphold a position in parliament, the catholic emancipation act enabled the Irish Catholics to buy land and hold positions within the government, do religious things which were thought to be wrong. The law enabled many Irish Catholics to be more satisfied therefore civilised. Giving rights to the catholic was seen as betrayal and this was a step in improvement however it was looked upon negatively. This was also not fair as not all the members of the parliament agree to passing this law therefore it created discontent within the government.

 

In conclusion, yes, the Liberal Tories were liberal in some aspects as they did try to understand what the working-class people and the upper-class people wanted. The government tried to make as many people happy as they could and this was an improvement to the government than in 1815-1822 because they did not take in to consideration people needs and dealt with the mayhem which ended in more frustration for protestors. However, individually they all contributed aspects of what they thought life should be like and as individuals their opinions were stronger to prove this was, Robert Peel and the Metropolitan police and there was George Canning who identified they needed to make people feel better about life. Then, there was also William Huskisson and Frederick Robison who made people take charge of their own lives and it represented freedom as they were their own boss and they were satisfied because they had no one else to blame as they are working for themselves. However their government decisions were weak and it meant not everyone agreed.


Simran Sandhu(Dart_07SanSim) 

improved version(aaliyah)

Aaliyah adenijichemas-microsoft-comSurprisedfficeSurprisedffice" />

12T

History practice assessment

 

How liberal were the liberal Tories (1822-1929)?

 

 

To start with, the liberal Tories were only quite liberal due to reasons associating with the distinction between whether or not the reforms were in fact liberal or efficient. In addition, Lord Liverpool, still prime minister at the time of liberal reforms, rebuilt his cabinet by finding new people to fill in important positions within the government. Unlike the years 1815-1822, Lord Liverpool took a different approach to how the government was to be run and how situations would be dealt with. Lord Liverpool’s finding of the following people made a momentum difference to how society was handled and improved the liberality of Britain: George Canning (of who assisted Lord Liverpool with the need of change and introduction of liberal reforms), William Huskisson, Frederick ‘prosperity’ Robinson and Robert peel.

 

Firstly, George Canning was foreign secretary of the cabinet and made an effective contribution to the recovery of the economy. He did this by achieving access into profitable markets located in South America in such countries like Buenos Aires, Mexico and Colombia. By recognising these three independent states, Canning was able to gain a trading advantage with them of which entitled the growth of economic prosperity in Britain to rise and increase the wealth of both the working classes and aristocracy societies. George canning was successful within this decision and recovery of the economy upon various other solutions he found to specific problems. For instance, due to his secured position of foreign secretary, canning was able to implement new reforms and ideas associated with other countries of which not only benefited him and his life, but also benefitted the lower, middle and upper classes.

 

At one point between 1822 and 1829, canning supported and assisted in the campaign of the abolition of slavery.  This accentuates his liberality as stopping slavery just goes to show how selfless his ideas and decisions were. By abolishing slavery, it gave those who were once slaves the freedom to become who they want to be and start working proper jobs rather than suffering at the feet of those who over-ruled them as individuals. Not only did his support in the campaign support the slaves themselves, but it also surprisingly supported the upper classes and aristocrats. This is because in the 1800s taxes were put on slaves of whom the upper classes had to try and keep up with and pay in order to keep the slaves. By abolishing slavery, the rich sectors of society were able to save money and use it for other purposes. To summarise the case of George Canning and his reforms, he was very successful. The reason behind this judgment is that he was an individual by which means his ideas were his own; they were original. Just this conclusion is enough to show that he was in fact a liberal tory and did not just make economic enhancing reforms or ideas simply for efficiency. Moreover, his actions were liberal as they aided in the start of great economic prosperity of which greatly benefited the economy by increasing the wealth of Britain. An example of enhanced economic prosperity would be a man named Frederick Robinson.

 

To start with, Frederick Robinson, also known as Frederick ‘prosperity ‘Robinson or ‘Goody’ increased the economies prosperity as hinted at within his nickname. Frederick Robinson entered the cabinet as the President of The Board of Trade. He was also made Chancellor of the Exchequer in which is the term given to a royal or national treasury of which were responsible for the funds of the British government. The main contributions Robinson made to the increase the prosperity of Britain was the introduction of four main reforms all associated with the reduction of taxes put onto a variety of much needed necessities  essential to a standard life in Britain. His first reform was conducted in 1823 whereby Robinson reduced or even repealed the taxes put on carriages and servants. However, one may argue that a disadvantage of this reform was that it mainly was to an advantage towards the richest of people as they were the classes who were accessible to the pleasure of affording patients. The second reform was conducted in 1824 of which Robinson eased the tax burden on the poor by cancelling various taxes put on essential commodities including coal, wool, and rum. This benefited the poor working classes both in the sense of living and working conditions. His third reform conducted in 1825 improved the lives of working classes. This is because he cancelled the house and window taxes that were put on the smaller houses. By doing this, Robinson increased the likelihood of those living in smaller houses to be able to afford them and remain living there, lowering their chances of living on the harsh streets, in poverty due to not being able to pay their taxes. In addition, his reduced tax reforms enabled economic prosperity to progress even more, enhancing the increase of economic prosperity provided by George Canning.

 

However, not all the liberal Tories came up with ideas that were based mainly on liberality. Unlike the reforms conducted by Canning and Robinson of which were liberal and benefitted society on a personal level, a particular tory named Robert Peel conducted reforms of which were thought to be liberal, but with deeper research turned out to be based more on efficiency.

 

Robert Peel of who was home secretary within the cabinet conducted reforms known as penal reforms of which are associated with the organisation of crime and imprisonment, and penal meaning the punishment of offenders and criminals under the legal system. The main aim of Robert peel was to conduct reforms and make the English law more humane and more efficient. His idea of improving efficiency was based on the pressure upon him received by humanitarians such as Elizabeth Fry and John Howard who both believed that there was a need for a more efficient system.

 

Peels reforms included the ‘reform of the penal code’ conducted in the years 1824-1826. It is in this particular reform that Peel demanded for the abolishment of the death penalty for the majority of crimes especially petty crimes of which a simple warning would do rather than death. As well as that, over 100 crime offences were removed, of which made the system more humane. Also, the reform of the penal code ensured that crime would reduce due to appropriate actions being taken to deal with certain crimes and suitable punishment put into place. The abolishment of the death penalty was efficient and more humane, as it increased mannerism and civilised behaviour within society.

 

Moreover, another efficient reform conducted by Peel and passes in 1823 was the ‘Jails (gaols) act’. This act stated that jails should be paid for and funded by the government rather than the prisoners themselves (of which could be argued to be an element of liberalism due to benefitting prisoners in terms of saving them money from not having to pay for their imprisonment). The reform also stated the importance of female and male segregation within the prisons.
A ( very good well done )
www. good points made , very well structured , a lot of knowledge and understanding about the liberal tories
Ebi . if there was a conlcusion to finish it off  and round up all your points

Aaliyah Adeniji(Dart_07AdeAal) 
 
Login
Forgotten password?
Having trouble logging in?
 





 Copyright 2011 Dartford Technology College
Contact the College